07/14/2021 / By Ethan Huff
A World Health Organization (WHO) spokesman recently reiterated the agency’s position on ivermectin as a potential treatment for the Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19), calling it “not very promising.”
Even though there is zero evidence to suggest that the “vaccines” do anything other than kill people and spread variants, the WHO is actively pushing the injections while downplaying the possible benefits of ivermectin.
The WHO decided to repeat this false message after FOX affiliate reporter Ivory Hecker got on television and announced, live on the air, that doctors are seeing positive results from administering ivermectin to their covid-“positive” patients, despite the medical industry’s overarching rejection of its use.
Hecker was lambasted by the establishment for making this claim, even though the data suggests that ivermectin is dramatically lowering deaths rates in clinics where it is being used, including at the United Memorial Medical Center in Houston.
Dr. Joseph Varon works at this facility, and he has given some 1,600 interviews over the past year explaining how ivermectin is doing wonders to help the sick. And yet “almost every (media) outlet” is rejecting Dr. Varon’s claims, almost as if they want people to suffer and die.
According to the data, only 86 of Dr. Varon’s 1,293 hospitalized Chinese Virus patients died between March 2020 and May 2021, translating to a 6.7 percent death rate. This is about half of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention‘s (CDC) death rate of around 12.5 percent at hospitals that are doing nothing but injecting people.
“We have implemented a series of treatment methods that have a very good success rate,” Dr. Varon says, noting that none of the treatments he is using are endorsed or recommended by the WHO, the CDC, or any other three-letter agency.
Dr. Varon is also credited with coming up with the MATH+ treatment protocol for Chinese Germs. This treatment plan involves the use of methylprednisolone, ascorbic acid (vitamin C), thiamine (vitamin B1), and the blood-thinning drug heparin.
The “+” refers to other additions such as ivermectin, which the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) also claims is “unproven” and potential “dangerous.”
The Front Line Covid-19 Critical Care Alliance says that ivermectin “is a well-known, FDA-approved anti-parasite drug that has been used successfully for more than four decades” to treat parasitic diseases.
“It is on the WHO’s list of essential medicines … and has won the Nobel prize for its global and historic impacts in eradicating endemic parasitic infections in many parts of the world,” the group further says.
Dr. Varon says that he has had “fantastic success” administering it to his Wuhan Flu patients, and that it is being used in some 62 trials, 32 of them being randomized controlled trials. Ivermectin is also mentioned in more than 60 peer-reviewed studies.
One study out of Australia found that ivermectin not only blocks the development of RNA viruses such as Zika, influenza, West Nile, and Avian, but also lethally attacks the Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19), wiping out “essentially all viral material by 48 hours.”
“Meta-analyses based on 18 randomized controlled treatment trials of ivermectin in COVID-19 have found large, statistically significant reductions in mortality, time to clinical recovery, and time to viral clearance,” Dr. Varon says.
Even so, the WHO, the CDC, and the FDA are having none of it. These agencies would all prefer that people just roll up their sleeves and have their DNA modified with mRNA and other deadly chemicals that will create a lifetime of chronic illness and likely early death.
The latest news about Fauci Flu deception can be found at Pandemic.news.
Sources for this article include:
Tagged Under: Big Pharma, CDC, conspiracy, coronavirus, COVID, deception, FDA, ivermectin, lies, truth, vaccination, vaccines, WHO, World Health Organization
COPYRIGHT © 2020 medicalcensorship.com
All content posted on this site is protected under Free Speech. medicalcensorship.com is not responsible for content written by contributing authors. The information on this site is provided for educational and entertainment purposes only. It is not intended as a substitute for professional advice of any kind. medicalcensorship.com assumes no responsibility for the use or misuse of this material. All trademarks, registered trademarks and service marks mentioned on this site are the property of their respective owners.