01/25/2022 / By Ethan Huff
Public health authorities in the Canadian province of Alberta outed themselves this week when they deleted incriminating data showing that they have been manipulating and lying about Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19) statistics.
Officials apparently did not realize they had even done this until members of the public noticed that, according to the data, most deaths from the Fauci Flu are occurring in people who got “vaccinated” for it.
It turns out that all this time, the government has been ignoring all adverse events, including infections, hospitalizations and deaths, that occur within 14 days after injection – regardless of the number of doses. (Related: Alberta was also counting all diseases as “covid”.)
The government of Alberta basically admitted that it has been using this fraudulent standard since the beginning of the plandemic. As a result, all jab injuries and deaths that occur within the first two weeks post-injection have been lumped in with “unvaccinated” deaths.
“In other words, anyone who was infected – was hospitalized – or even died, in the two weeks following their first, second, or even THIRD dose would be recorded as an unvaccinated case,” reported The Gateway Pundit (TGP).
“And now, thanks to the now-deleted data, we can tell exactly how many cases have been fraudulently manipulated by inadvertently including the time from dose to infection for each of the events – and as it turns out, over half of the vaccinated deaths were added to the unvaccinated.”
Based on the data, we now know that upwards of 56 percent of all “recorded” covid-related deaths occurred in people who had just been vaccinated. And almost 90 percent occurred within 45 days, which is especially noteworthy because this is the timeframe during which the jabs are said to have the most “effectiveness.”
As far as hospitalizations go, the numbers are similar. Nearly half of all severe cases of “covid” recorded in Alberta’s data occurred in people who had gotten injected within the previous two weeks. A whopping 80 percent of hospitalizations occurred within the first 45 days post-injection.
Infections, meaning “positive” test results not necessarily accompanied by actual symptoms, clocked in at 40 percent during the first two weeks post-jab.
“I guess it could be possible that the excess hospitalizations over cases and deaths over hospitalizations could be subject to prioritization of the sick but I don’t think it really matters,” points out Metatron on his Substack.
“It’s the sick that needed protection anyway, not the healthy! And if it didn’t improve [the] outcome for the sick then what exactly is the point??”
Keep in mind that these same corrupted standards are the norm in the United States and elsewhere. Pretty much every country that has gone along with the covid scam embraced a two-week waiting period post-injection to consider a vaccinated person vaccinated.
“It has long been assumed that the U.S. and others around the world have been fudging the data just like the Canadian Government has been doing,” reported TGP. “If this is the case, it is yet another evil human rights violation to add to the docket in the Nuremberg 2.0 trials.”
In the comment section, a reader pointed out that the PCR test is not an appropriate tool for testing the presence of any disease. The test’s creator admitted this prior to his death.
“The PCR test is NOT appropriate for this type of testing, they account almost any type of death as a COVID death, no proof that this virus even exists,” this person wrote. “This is why they have to do this.”
More related news about the Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19) can be found at Pandemic.news.
Sources for this article include:
Tagged Under: Alberta, big government, Big Pharma, conspiracy, COVID, deception, disinfo, lies, medical censorship, Medical Tyranny, newly vaccinated, pharmaceutical fraud, Plandemic, unvaccinated, vaccine wars, vaccines
COPYRIGHT © 2020 medicalcensorship.com
All content posted on this site is protected under Free Speech. medicalcensorship.com is not responsible for content written by contributing authors. The information on this site is provided for educational and entertainment purposes only. It is not intended as a substitute for professional advice of any kind. medicalcensorship.com assumes no responsibility for the use or misuse of this material. All trademarks, registered trademarks and service marks mentioned on this site are the property of their respective owners.